Detractors contend that these lawsuits promote anti-fossil fuel agendas and could increase expenses for consumers. Conversely, supporters argue that such actions are essential for holding corporations responsible for environmental damage. The cases, which rely on state nuisance laws, may establish a precedent for future legal actions against other sectors.
There are concerns that these lawsuits, supported by progressive advocacy organizations, might lead to changes in policy through judicial means rather than through legislative processes, potentially affecting future energy regulations. Legal fees and consultation are also significant considerations in this context.
