{"id":19207,"date":"2025-10-22T20:47:20","date_gmt":"2025-10-22T20:47:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/?p=19207"},"modified":"2025-10-22T20:47:20","modified_gmt":"2025-10-22T20:47:20","slug":"supreme-court-turns-down-chance-to-claw-back-abortion-clinic-buffer-zones","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/?p=19207","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Turns Down Chance To Claw Back Abortion Clinic Buffer Zones"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"image-link\" href=\"https:\/\/cnsfressnews.ink\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/3-129.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"attachment-hitmag-featured size-hitmag-featured wp-post-image\" src=\"https:\/\/cnsfressnews.ink\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/3-129-735x400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"735\" height=\"400\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<header class=\"entry-header\">\n<div class=\"entry-meta\">The U.S. Supreme Court turned down a chance to change its previous decision that allowed buffer zones around abortion clinics, even though two of the court\u2019s most conservative members were against it.<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<article id=\"post-18322\" class=\"hitmag-single post-18322 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-news\">\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<div class=\"entry-content entry clearfix\">\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-1\">\n<div id=\"e1c09a52-67a1-44a3-a58e-fc2bf67380c6\" class=\"_ap_apex_ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The court said in two orders that it would not hear challenges to laws in Carbondale, Ill., and Englewood, N.J., that stop anti-abortion activists from \u201csidewalk counseling\u201d people who are going to an abortion clinic.<\/p>\n<p>Both Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken up the case, but it needed the votes of four justices to be carried out.<\/p>\n<p>Based on the Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Hill v. Colorado in 2000, lower courts upheld the ordinances in both cities. That decision said that a similar law in Colorado did not violate the First Amendment.<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-2\">Advertisement<\/div>\n<p>Since then, groups against abortion have tried to destroy the precedent. Some conservative justices recently said that the decision was an abuse of free speech, including in the Supreme Court\u2019s opinion overturning constitutional protections for abortion. This gave them more hope.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHill has been seriously undermined, if not completely eroded, and our refusal to provide clarity is an abdication of our judicial duty,\u201d Thomas wrote.<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-7\">Advertisement&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"as5808\" data-title=\"You Might Also Like\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>\u201cHill was wrong the day it was decided, and the case for overruling it has only strengthened ever since,\u201d Paul Clement, a veteran conservative Supreme Court attorney who previously served as solicitor general, wrote in the petition challenging Carbondale\u2019s ordinance.<\/p>\n<p>Coalition Life is an anti-abortion group that does \u201csidewalk counseling\u201d in places like Carbondale. Clement worked for them. To get rid of the 24-year-old rule, the group asked for help from 15 Republican state attorneys general, Alliance Defending Freedom, and other anti-abortion groups.<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-10\">Advertisement<\/div>\n<p>As it asked the court to reject Coalition Life\u2019s appeal, the city pointed out that its law had been thrown out.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPetitioner wants to fast-track a request that this Court overturn Hill just as it overturned Roe v. Wade. This Court should deny that request. This case is a far cry from an ideal\u2014or even passable\u2014vehicle for revisiting Hill,\u201d Neal Katyal, another veteran Supreme Court advocate, who served as acting solicitor general under former President Barack Obama, wrote on behalf of the city.<\/p>\n<p>In Englewood, resident Jeryl Turco fought against a similar law that the city passed in 2014 to create a buffer zone around an abortion clinic because of violent protesters from a group called Bread of Life.<\/p>\n<p>Turco is not part of the group and said the ordinance violated her First Amendment rights to work as a sidewalk counselor in a way that was not allowed.<\/p>\n<p>Jay Sekulow, who is the lead counsel at the conservative American Center for Law and Justice, was her lawyer. Sekulow was one of President Trump\u2019s lawyers in his first trial for impeachment.<\/p>\n<p>Englewood urged the court to turn away the case, saying it \u201cis extremely fact-sensitive and involves material credibility issues that the District Court has resolved. Also, the facts of this case are unique because of Petitioner\u2019s method of sidewalk counseling.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-12\">\n<div data-delay=\"4000\" data-block=\"12\">\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>In a separate case, the nation\u2019s highest court declined to hear a challenge by civil and voting rights groups seeking to overturn Pennsylvania\u2019s requirement that mail-in ballots include a handwritten date on the outer envelope.<\/p>\n<p>The groups argued that the mandate is unnecessary and has led to the disqualification of valid ballots.<\/p>\n<p>The justices refused to review a lower court ruling that upheld the requirement, rejecting the claim that it violated federal law, which prohibits discarding ballots for paperwork errors that are \u201cnot material\u201d to determining a voter\u2019s eligibility.<\/p>\n<p>In 2024, the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that while the date requirement \u201cserves little apparent purpose\u201d\u2014as it is not used to verify if a ballot was received on time\u2014it remains lawful.<\/p>\n<p>The court reasoned that the 1964 Civil Rights Act applies to voter registration rules determining eligibility to vote, not to how a ballot must be submitted to be counted.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. Supreme Court turned down a chance to change its previous decision that allowed buffer zones around abortion clinics, even though two of the court\u2019s most conservative members were &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19208,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19207"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19207\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19209,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19207\/revisions\/19209"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/19208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}