{"id":15137,"date":"2025-09-28T20:17:17","date_gmt":"2025-09-28T20:17:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/?p=15137"},"modified":"2025-09-28T20:17:17","modified_gmt":"2025-09-28T20:17:17","slug":"supreme-court-allows-trump-to-remove-democratic-ftc-member-for-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/?p=15137","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Allows Trump To Remove Democratic FTC Member For Now"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>President Donald Trump has received approval from the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-1\"><\/div>\n<p>The Trump administration requested an emergency injunction from the Supreme Court last week to halt the lower court\u2019s decisions and expedite Slaughter\u2019s removal. The government has also asked the court to hear the entire case to settle the constitutional issue of whether a president can fire the heads of independent agencies.<\/p>\n<p>The Justice Department said in its filing that the FTC\u2019s powers had grown a lot since 1935, and that the president can now fire its commissioners, giving them a lot of executive power.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe lower courts have once again ordered the reinstatement of a high-level officer wielding substantial executive authority whom the president has determined should not exercise any executive power, let alone significant rulemaking and enforcement powers,\u201d US Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-2\">Advertisement<\/div>\n<p>In March, Trump removed Slaughter and another Democratic FTC commissioner. A federal district court mandated her reinstatement in July. On Tuesday, an appeals court said Trump couldn\u2019t fire Slaughter right now.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe government has no likelihood of success on appeal given controlling and directly on point Supreme Court precedent,\u201d the court order read, citing the 1935 case, Humphrey\u2019s Executor v. US.<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-7\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<div id=\"as5808\" data-title=\"You Might Also Like\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The nation\u2019s highest court has been busy lately.<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh issued warnings this summer to lower court judges, cautioning them against defying precedents set by the high court in a series of cases involving President Donald Trump\u2019s administration.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLower court judges may sometimes disagree with this court\u2019s decisions, but they are never free to defy them,\u201d Gorsuch\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.aol.com\/news\/trump-supreme-court-justices-frustrated-080042701.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">wrote<\/a>\u00a0in an opinion last week.<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-10\">Advertisement<\/div>\n<p>The decision was related to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/conservativebrief.com\/supreme-trump-4-94432\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trump\u2019s cancellation<\/a>\u00a0of nearly $800 million in federal research grants. Kavanaugh joined the opinion, which criticized a district court for disregarding an earlier Supreme Court order.<\/p>\n<p>Gorsuch noted that it was \u201cthe third time in a matter of weeks this court has had to intercede in a case \u2018squarely controlled\u2019 by one of its precedents.\u201d He added, \u201cWhen this court issues a decision, it constitutes a precedent that commands respect in lower courts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The decision allowed the administration to keep the grants frozen, overturning a ruling from U.S. District Judge William Young, who made the baseless claim he had \u201cnever seen government racial discrimination like this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Other justices have also criticized lower courts.<\/p>\n<p>In March, Justice Samuel Alito\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/24pdf\/24a831_3135.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">said<\/a>\u00a0a federal judge had committed an \u201cact of judicial hubris\u201d in a case involving another Trump policy.<\/p>\n<p>The high court has sided with the administration on a number of emergency docket cases this year, including disputes over immigration, spending, and the leadership of independent agencies. In some instances, the justices have ruled in Trump\u2019s favor even when the executive branch had not complied with lower court orders.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissenting in the NIH funding case, compared the majority\u2019s approach to \u201cCalvinball jurisprudence,\u201d referring to the comic strip in which rules constantly change. \u201cCalvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules,\u201d she wrote. \u201cWe seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"code-block code-block-12\">\n<div data-delay=\"4000\" data-block=\"12\">\n<div>\n<div id=\"e1c09a52-67a1-44a3-a58e-fc2bf67380c6\" class=\"_ap_apex_ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Justice Sonia Sotomayor has also criticized the majority\u2019s handling of Trump cases. In a dissent earlier this summer involving deportations, she wrote that the court was \u201crewarding lawlessness.\u201d \u201cThis is not the first time the court closes its eyes to noncompliance, nor, I fear, will it be the last,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>At issue is how much weight lower courts should give to the Supreme Court\u2019s emergency orders, which are often unsigned and issued without detailed reasoning.<\/p>\n<p>While the justices have emphasized that such rulings are not conclusive on the merits, recent opinions have said they should still guide short-term outcomes in similar cases.<\/p>\n<p>The court also issued a major ruling this year restricting the power of district judges to impose nationwide injunctions, which had been used in both Republican and Democratic administrations to block policies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>President Donald Trump has received approval from the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The Trump administration requested an emergency &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15138,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15137"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15137\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15139,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15137\/revisions\/15139"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/15138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cndailynews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}